| All Forums |
Register |
Login |
Search |
Subscriptions |
My Profile |
Inbox |
| Tool Warehouse |
FAQs |
Resources |
Help |
Member List |
Address Book |
Logout |
|
|
Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU..
|
Logged in as: Guest |
| Users viewing this topic: none |
|
Login  |
|
|
 Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - May 12, '04, 11:16:05 AM
|
|
|
gs
Posts: 4
Joined: May 12, '04,
Status: offline
|
Windows 2003 Terminal Server
SFU 3.5
After reinstalling SFU packages only Administrator can start
shells, use Unix commands and so on.
When Administrator tries (in a shell):
su user
the answer is:
su: /bin/sh: Permission denied
/bin/sh is a link to /bin/bash, the permissions are right, so
I think it's not a Unix problem..
Any ideas? Thank you in Advance!
Gerhard Schneider
P.S.: NFS server/client, User mapping and so on are working..
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - May 12, '04, 11:24:14 AM
|
|
|
Rodney
Posts: 3728
Joined: Jul. 9, '02,
From: /Tools lab
Status: offline
|
What happens when you restore /bin/sh to be a symlink to /bin/ksh
(as it was when installed) ?
What are the perms on /usr/local/bin/bash ?
How did your bash get into /bin/bash ? Is it a symlink ?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - May 12, '04, 11:41:54 AM
|
|
|
gs
Posts: 4
Joined: May 12, '04,
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Rodney
What happens when you restore /bin/sh to be a symlink to /bin/ksh
(as it was when installed) ?
What are the perms on /usr/local/bin/bash ?
How did your bash get into /bin/bash ? Is it a symlink ?
Sorry, it was the /bin/ksh (my fault.)
Removing the symlink and copying /bin/ksh to /bin/sh didn't
work, too..
GS
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - May 12, '04, 4:00:19 PM
|
|
|
markfunk
Posts: 673
Joined: Mar. 31, '03,
Status: offline
|
did you enable "setuid" functionality when you installed Interix ?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - May 13, '04, 3:42:58 AM
|
|
|
gs
Posts: 4
Joined: May 12, '04,
Status: offline
|
Yes, and the registry entry is there..
It worked till I installed software, License keys for the
terminal server license server and so on..
I don't know when it stopped to work, but I'm sure its
an underlying problem..
In the Event Viewer I get Event 1017 from Interix:
Unexpected Exception pid=1347 cid=0x10d0.0x10d4 code=0xc0000022
fc=0
No help from events.asp
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - May 13, '04, 11:07:17 AM
|
|
|
Rodney
Posts: 3728
Joined: Jul. 9, '02,
From: /Tools lab
Status: offline
|
Was there any other software installed at the same time?
I'm asking because there was another person (about 3 weeks back)
that had a problem with a Cisco security program that was restricting
access only to files it had in a special list.
The other question is which administrator are you? The local or the domain?
The o/p of the 'id' command will tell us.
Then, for the user being su'd to: local or domain? Again 'id'.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - May 13, '04, 11:13:44 AM
|
|
|
gs
Posts: 4
Joined: May 12, '04,
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Rodney
Was there any other software installed at the same time?
I'm asking because there was another person (about 3 weeks back)
that had a problem with a Cisco security program that was restricting
access only to files it had in a special list.
No. One attempt was to deinstall the software (w/o cleaning
the registry manually), rebooting, reinstalling, rebooting.
No other software install running
quote:
The other question is which administrator are you? The local or the domain?
The o/p of the 'id' command will tell us.
Then, for the user being su'd to: local or domain? Again 'id'.
It's the same. It's a domain controller that is a Terminal Server,
too..
Thank you!
Gerhard Schneider
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - May 13, '04, 12:16:04 PM
|
|
|
markfunk
Posts: 673
Joined: Mar. 31, '03,
Status: offline
|
The "unexpected exception" message means that while the Interix process was being created (by NT kernel), the NT kernel determined that there was something wrong when loading the executable and/or loading/initializing the required DLL's (ntdll.dll, psxdll.dll, ....) and the NT kernel terminated the executable.
I've heard from other people that have had similar experiences. But I don't recall anyone actually posting a workaround or the reason for this behaviour.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - May 24, '04, 7:38:36 PM
|
|
|
vanny1
Posts: 2
Joined: May 24, '04,
Status: offline
|
I am having exactly the same problem. Only Administrator can run any of the UNIX commands. While I try running the "ls" command it gives me no output and no error. Just gives me the command prompt. I looked at permissions of the files and all appears to be good for a non-administrator user. Each command just doesn't do a thing. I also am using Windows 2003 with Terminal Services installed.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - Jun. 8, '04, 12:20:46 PM
|
|
|
vanny1
Posts: 2
Joined: May 24, '04,
Status: offline
|
I looked at the Microsoft web site and found that there is an issue running SFU on earlier O/S systems running Windows Terminal Services and therefore Microsoft doesn't support it. So if this is the case then I guess it is back to cygwin to get my unix utilities to work or maybe switching back over to linux instead.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - Jun. 8, '04, 12:49:44 PM
|
|
|
Rodney
Posts: 3728
Joined: Jul. 9, '02,
From: /Tools lab
Status: offline
|
If you look closely at the Microsoft report you will read that it
applied to earlier version of SFU/Interix. It doesn't do NT 4.0 TSE
for version 3.0 or 3.5 (by info on the box) which implies that TSE
on later versions is okay. I'm sure I saw a specific list saying TS
was good for W2K-server and W2K3. But I can't find it right now. I'll
look some more.
There has been an update for the 3.5 download WRT how SFU is installed.
The content is the same, but something in the installation was tweaked
for W2K3 and the upcoming XP-reloaded. When did you download SFU 3.5 ?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - Jun. 8, '04, 12:59:07 PM
|
|
|
Rodney
Posts: 3728
Joined: Jul. 9, '02,
From: /Tools lab
Status: offline
|
SFU 3.5 on TS is a supported platform with Windows 2000 and 2003.
< Message edited by Rodney -- Jun. 8, '04, 12:59:44 PM >
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - Jun. 9, '06, 11:03:48 AM
|
|
|
h.ancher
Posts: 2
Joined: Jun. 9, '06,
Status: offline
|
Hi everyboby,
I move UP this topic because I've got exactly the same problem with shell access permissions.
I've got the two systems under Windows 2003 SP1 + SFU 3.5 which one have Terminal Services installed.
On server with T.S., only administrator's user can be access to the shell.
On the other server (without T.S.), all users can access to the shell.
Someone have informations about this problem ?
Ps : Sorry for my bad english.
< Message edited by h.ancher -- Jun. 9, '06, 11:07:44 AM >
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Newbie: Only Administrator can use SFU.. - Jun. 12, '06, 3:00:10 AM
|
|
|
h.ancher
Posts: 2
Joined: Jun. 9, '06,
Status: offline
|
Nobody ?
I think it's simply a right to apply at my user or modify the group policies...
Someone can be help me ?
|
|
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
|
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
 Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|
|
Printable Version
