Free Downloads, Community Forum,
FAQs and Developer Resources


Make /Tools Your Home | Link to us

Today's posts | Posts since last visit | Most Active Topics

All Forums Register Login Search Subscriptions My Profile Inbox
Tool Warehouse FAQs Resources Help Member List Address Book Logout

differences between free and commercial packages

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Interop Secure Shell (Commercial Product)] >> Interop Secure Shell Support >> differences between free and commercial packages Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
differences between free and commercial packages - Aug. 22, '06, 9:35:59 AM   
ehall

 

Posts: 31
Joined: May 29, '05,
Status: offline
I read through the announcement and it looks like there are some differences but most of it talks about licensing and support differences.

In particular, I am wondering how user authentication is different? For example, the free stuff needs to have users with local login privs and the login shell is stored in the user's NT Domain "comments" field, and the announcement seems to suggest that you guys are doing something different here but it doesn't really say.
Post #: 1
RE: differences between free and commercial packages - Aug. 22, '06, 1:53:17 PM   
Rodney

 

Posts: 3695
Joined: Jul. 9, '02,
From: /Tools lab
Status: offline
The base authentication does remain the same (authenticating with the user
database, e.g. AD). But there are additional control and monitoring mechanisms
added as well. These controls work in an ACL-like manner to accept or deny
users based on which access they are requesting (ssh or sftp), where they are
accessing from (location), a chroot jail selection, live tracing alerts, etc.
There is also a lot more logging to follow who does what, when and with what
(this is important for a number of recent US laws for corporations). This is
all done on a per user basis (fine granularity). The base authentication is
still looked at first -- it is not by-passed.

The shell being stored in the comments field is a decision made back about
9 years ago with Interix when it was at Softway (and called OpenNT then). None
of the NT admin stuff used the field. This continues to be used if set, but
the configuration file can be used to set this for the initial login
on a per user basis instead.

(in reply to ehall)
Post #: 2
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Interop Secure Shell (Commercial Product)] >> Interop Secure Shell Support >> differences between free and commercial packages Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Search All Forums -

Advanced search


SPONSORS



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI

0.063